Treatment of refractory unstable angina in geographically isolated areas without cardiac surgery. Invasive versus conservative strategy (TRUCS study)

dc.contributor.authorMichalis, L. K.en
dc.contributor.authorStroumbis, C. S.en
dc.contributor.authorPappas, K.en
dc.contributor.authorSourla, E.en
dc.contributor.authorNiokou, D.en
dc.contributor.authorGoudevenos, J. A.en
dc.contributor.authorSiogas, C.en
dc.contributor.authorSideris, D. A.en
dc.date.accessioned2015-11-24T19:05:24Z
dc.date.available2015-11-24T19:05:24Z
dc.identifier.issn0195-668X-
dc.identifier.urihttps://olympias.lib.uoi.gr/jspui/handle/123456789/20188
dc.rightsDefault Licence-
dc.subject*Air Ambulancesen
dc.subjectAngina, Unstable/*drug therapy/*surgeryen
dc.subjectAngioplastyen
dc.subjectCoronary Artery Bypassen
dc.subjectFemaleen
dc.subjectGreeceen
dc.subjectHumansen
dc.subjectMaleen
dc.subject*Medically Underserved Areaen
dc.subjectMiddle Ageden
dc.subject*Myocardial Reperfusionen
dc.subjectPlatelet Aggregation Inhibitors/*therapeutic useen
dc.subjectProspective Studiesen
dc.subjectTreatment Outcomeen
dc.titleTreatment of refractory unstable angina in geographically isolated areas without cardiac surgery. Invasive versus conservative strategy (TRUCS study)en
heal.abstractAIMS: We compared invasive (on-site coronary angioplasty or emergency air-ambulance transfer for bypass grafting surgery) vs conservative (persistent medical treatment) strategies in the management of refractory unstable angina in geographically isolated hospitals without cardiac surgical facilities. METHODS AND RESULTS: One hundred and forty eight randomized patients with refractory unstable angina were compared on an intention-to-treat basis. Outcomes (invasive vs conservative): (a) in hospital: stabilization (96% vs 43%, P=0.0001), non-fatal myocardial infarction (2.6% vs 4.2%, P=ns), death (1.3% vs 8.3%, P=0.046), combined outcome (3.9% vs 12.5%, P=0.053) and hospitalization (11.4+/-6.3 vs 12.4+/-8.0 days, P=ns). (b) 30-days follow-up: non-fatal myocardial infarction (2.6% vs 4.2%, P=ns), death (2.6% vs 11.1%, P=0.030) and combined outcome (5.3% vs 15.3%, P=0.031). (c) 12 month follow-up: non-fatal myocardial infarction (3. 9% vs 4.2%, P=ns), death (3.9% vs 12.5%, P=0.053), combined outcome (7.9% vs 16.7%, P=ns), re-admissions for unstable angina: (17.1% vs 23.6%, P=ns), late coronary angioplasty: (15.8% vs 11.1%, P=ns) and (d) late coronary bypass grafting: (7.9% vs 12.5%, P=ns). CONCLUSION: Invasive treatment of patients with refractory angina in remote areas without surgical back-up results in significant in-hospital stabilization and a reduction in major events in-hospital and at 30 days. Coronary angioplasty in stand-alone units and air-transfer of these patients seems safe.en
heal.accesscampus-
heal.fullTextAvailabilityTRUE-
heal.identifier.primary10.1053/euhj.2000.2397-
heal.identifier.secondaryhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11071801-
heal.identifier.secondaryhttp://eurheartj.oxfordjournals.org/content/21/23/1954.full.pdf-
heal.journalNameEur Heart Jen
heal.journalTypepeer-reviewed-
heal.languageen-
heal.publicationDate2000-
heal.recordProviderΠανεπιστήμιο Ιωαννίνων. Σχολή Επιστημών Υγείας. Τμήμα Ιατρικήςel
heal.typejournalArticle-
heal.type.elΆρθρο Περιοδικούel
heal.type.enJournal articleen

Αρχεία

Φάκελος/Πακέτο αδειών

Προβολή: 1 - 1 of 1
Φόρτωση...
Μικρογραφία εικόνας
Ονομα:
license.txt
Μέγεθος:
1.74 KB
Μορφότυπο:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Περιγραφή: