Variation in stakeholder opinion on countermeasures across Europe

Απλή σελίδα τεκμηρίου
dc.contributor.authorNisbet, A. F.en
dc.contributor.authorMercer, J. A.en
dc.contributor.authorRantavaara, A.en
dc.contributor.authorHanninen, R.en
dc.contributor.authorVandecasteele, C.en
dc.contributor.authorHardeman, F.en
dc.contributor.authorIoannides, K. G.en
dc.contributor.authorTzialla, C.en
dc.contributor.authorOllagnon, H.en
dc.contributor.authorPupin, V.en
dc.contributor.authorJullien, T.en
dc.date.accessioned2015-11-24T18:35:58Z
dc.date.available2015-11-24T18:35:58Z
dc.identifier.issn0265-931X-
dc.identifier.urihttps://olympias.lib.uoi.gr/jspui/handle/123456789/17154
dc.rightsDefault Licence-
dc.subjectfarmingen
dc.subjectstrategyen
dc.subjectstakeholdersen
dc.subjectagricultural countermeasuresen
dc.subjectfood chainen
dc.subjectradioactive contaminationen
dc.titleVariation in stakeholder opinion on countermeasures across Europeen
heal.abstractA compendium of agricultural countermeasures and rural waste disposal options has been compiled as part of the EC STRATEGY (Sustainable Restoration and Long-Term Management of Contaminated Rural, Urban and Industrial Ecosystems) project. The compendium was discussed by the FARMING (Food and Agriculture Restoration Management Involving Networked Groups) network of stakeholders during meetings of national panels in the UK, Finland, Belgium, Greece and France in 2002. Their preliminary feedback has been summarised in terms of whether an option is generally acceptable, unacceptable or only acceptable under specific circumstances. A considerable divergence of opinion between national panels was apparent for many of the options considered. This could be attributed to differences in geomorphology, climate, land management, infrastructure, consumer confidence, sociopolitical context and culture. Where consensus was reached between stakeholders it was generally for those countermeasures that provide public reassurance, sustain farming practices and minimise environmental impact. Furthermore, whilst there was general agreement that contaminated food should not enter the food chain, many of the options proposed for its subsequent management were not generally acceptable to stakeholders. (c) 2005 Health Protection Agency. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.en
heal.accesscampus-
heal.fullTextAvailabilityTRUE-
heal.identifier.primaryDOI 10.1016/j.jenvrad.2004.03.038-
heal.identifier.secondary<Go to ISI>://000231715300010-
heal.identifier.secondaryhttp://ac.els-cdn.com/S0265931X05001098/1-s2.0-S0265931X05001098-main.pdf?_tid=341bbf378409096cd60901d15e1114d0&acdnat=1334223114_df50dc75450ffca39bce60e0e5eb2e09-
heal.journalNameJ Environ Radioacten
heal.journalTypepeer reviewed-
heal.languageen-
heal.publicationDate2005-
heal.recordProviderΠανεπιστήμιο Ιωαννίνων. Σχολή Επιστημών και Τεχνολογιών. Τμήμα Βιολογικών Εφαρμογών και Τεχνολογιώνel
heal.typejournalArticle-
heal.type.elΆρθρο Περιοδικούel
heal.type.enJournal articleen

Αρχεία

Φάκελος/Πακέτο αδειών

Προβολή: 1 - 1 of 1
Μικρογραφία εικόνας
Ονομα:
license.txt
Μέγεθος:
1.74 KB
Μορφότυπο:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Περιγραφή:
Κατεβάστε

Συλλογές

Άρθρα σε επιστημονικά περιοδικά ( Ανοικτά)