Dose-dense sequential chemotherapy with epirubicin and paclitaxel versus the combination, as first-line chemotherapy, in advanced breast cancer: a randomized study conducted by the Hellenic Cooperative Oncology Group
Loading...
Date
Authors
Fountzilas, G.
Papadimitriou, C.
Dafni, U.
Bafaloukos, D.
Skarlos, D.
Moulopoulos, L. A.
Razis, E.
Kalofonos, H. P.
Aravantinos, G.
Briassoulis, E.
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Abstract
Type
Type of the conference item
Journal type
peer-reviewed
Educational material type
Conference Name
Journal name
J Clin Oncol
Book name
Book series
Book edition
Alternative title / Subtitle
Description
PURPOSE: To compare the efficacy of two different schedules of epirubicin and paclitaxel, as first-line chemotherapy, in patients with advanced breast cancer (ABC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: From October 1997 until May 1999, 183 eligible patients with ABC entered the study. Chemotherapy in group A (93 patients) consisted of four cycles of epirubicin at a dose of 110 mg/m(2) followed by four cycles of paclitaxel at a dose of 225 mg/m(2) in a 3-hour infusion. All cycles were repeated every 2 weeks with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor support. The therapeutic regimen in group B (90 patients) consisted of epirubicin (80 mg/m(2)) immediately followed by paclitaxel (175 mg/m(2) in a 3-hour infusion) every 3 weeks for six cycles. RESULTS: In total, 79 patients (85%) in group A and 72 patients (80%) in group B completed treatment. The median relative dose-intensity of epirubicin was 0.96 in both groups, and that of paclitaxel was 0.96 and 0.97 in groups A and B, respectively. The complete response rate was higher in group A (21.5% v 9% P =.02). Nevertheless, there was no significant difference in the overall response rate between the two groups (55% v 42%, P =.10). Severe neutropenia was more frequently observed with concurrent treatment. After a median follow-up of 16.5 months, median time to progression was 10 months in group A and 8.5 months in group B (P =.27), and median survival was 21.5 and 20 months, respectively (P =.17). CONCLUSION: The present study failed to demonstrate a significant difference in overall response rate between dose-dense sequential administration of epirubicin and paclitaxel compared with the combination of the two drugs given on the same day, even though the sequential treatment resulted in a significantly higher complete response rate.
Description
Keywords
Adult, Aged, Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/*therapeutic use, Breast Neoplasms/*drug therapy/pathology, Disease Progression, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Drug Administration Schedule, Epirubicin/administration & dosage, Female, Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor/administration & dosage, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Neutropenia/chemically induced, Paclitaxel/administration & dosage, Survival Analysis, Treatment Outcome
Subject classification
Citation
Link
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11304776
Language
en
Publishing department/division
Advisor name
Examining committee
General Description / Additional Comments
Institution and School/Department of submitter
Πανεπιστήμιο Ιωαννίνων. Σχολή Επιστημών Υγείας. Τμήμα Ιατρικής