Trade liberation strategies: what Could Southeastern Europe Learn from the CEFTA and BFTA?
| dc.contributor.author | Adam, A. | en |
| dc.contributor.author | Kosma, Th. | en |
| dc.contributor.author | McHugh, J. | en |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2015-11-24T17:04:38Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2015-11-24T17:04:38Z | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://olympias.lib.uoi.gr/jspui/handle/123456789/11207 | |
| dc.rights | Default Licence | - |
| dc.subject | Trade liberalization, gravity models, stability pact, CEFTA, BFTA | en |
| dc.title | Trade liberation strategies: what Could Southeastern Europe Learn from the CEFTA and BFTA? | en |
| heal.abstract | This paper explores the effectiveness of the Central European Free Trade Area (CEFTA) and the Baltic Free Trade Area (BFTA). Estimates from a gravity model and bilateral trade data support the view that both CEFTA and BFTA helped expand regional trade and limit the emergence of a " hub-and-spoke" relationship between the CEECs and the European Union (EU). These empirical conclusions carry some important policy implications for the " second wave" of prospective EU members among Southeastern European Countries (SEECs). The paper argues that the SEECs should reconsider their bilateral approach to trade liberalization and move towards a multilateral free-trade area as exemplified by both the CEFTA and BFTA. | en |
| heal.access | campus | - |
| heal.fullTextAvailability | TRUE | - |
| heal.journalName | IMF Working paper | en |
| heal.journalType | peer reviewed | - |
| heal.language | en | - |
| heal.publicationDate | 2003 | - |
| heal.recordProvider | Πανεπιστήμιο Ιωαννίνων. Σχολή Οικονομικών και Κοινωνικών Επιστημών. Τμήμα Οικονομικών Επιστημών | el |
| heal.type | journalArticle | - |
| heal.type.el | Άρθρο Περιοδικού | el |
| heal.type.en | Journal article | en |
Αρχεία
Φάκελος/Πακέτο αδειών
1 - 1 of 1
Φόρτωση...
- Ονομα:
- license.txt
- Μέγεθος:
- 1.74 KB
- Μορφότυπο:
- Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
- Περιγραφή: