Comparative effectiveness of medical interventions in adults versus children

dc.contributor.authorContopoulos-Ioannidis, D. G.en
dc.contributor.authorBaltogianni, M. S.en
dc.contributor.authorIoannidis, J. P.en
dc.date.accessioned2015-11-24T19:28:58Z
dc.date.available2015-11-24T19:28:58Z
dc.identifier.issn1097-6833-
dc.identifier.urihttps://olympias.lib.uoi.gr/jspui/handle/123456789/22938
dc.rightsDefault Licence-
dc.subjectAdulten
dc.subjectAge Factorsen
dc.subjectChilden
dc.subjectComparative Effectiveness Researchen
dc.subjectHealth Services/*utilizationen
dc.subjectHumansen
dc.subject*Intervention Studiesen
dc.subjectMeta-Analysis as Topicen
dc.subjectOdds Ratioen
dc.subjectOutcome Assessment (Health Care)en
dc.subjectRandomized Controlled Trials as Topicen
dc.subjectResearch Designen
dc.subjectTreatment Outcomeen
dc.titleComparative effectiveness of medical interventions in adults versus childrenen
heal.abstractOBJECTIVE: To estimate the comparative effectiveness of medical interventions in adults versus children. STUDY DESIGN: We identified from the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (Issue 1, 2007) meta-analyses with data on at least 1 adult and 1 pediatric randomized trial with binary primary efficacy outcome. For each meta-analysis, we calculated the summary odds ratio of the adult trials and the pediatric trials, respectively; the relative odds ratio (ROR) of the adult versus pediatric odds ratios per meta-analysis; and the summary ROR across all meta-analyses. ROR <1 means that the experimental intervention is more unfavorable in children than adults. RESULTS: Across 128 eligible meta-analyses (1051 adult and 343 pediatric trials), the summary ROR did not show a statistically significant difference between adults and children (0.96; 95% confidence intervals, 0.86 to 1.08). However, in all meta-analyses except for 1, the individual ROR's 95% confidence intervals could not exclude a relative difference in efficacy over 20%. In two-thirds, the relative difference in observed point estimates exceeded 50%. Nine statistically significant discrepancies were identified; 4 of them were also clinically important. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment effects are on average similar in adults and children, but available evidence leaves large uncertainty about their relative efficacy. Clinically important discrepancies may occur.en
heal.accesscampus-
heal.fullTextAvailabilityTRUE-
heal.identifier.primary10.1016/j.jpeds.2010.02.011-
heal.identifier.secondaryhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20434730-
heal.identifier.secondaryhttp://ac.els-cdn.com/S0022347610001216/1-s2.0-S0022347610001216-main.pdf?_tid=0566388665c78496f117829115288497&acdnat=1333363539_ecd96816a4fd3aae783d2d014f022a25-
heal.journalNameJ Pediatren
heal.journalTypepeer-reviewed-
heal.languageen-
heal.publicationDate2010-
heal.recordProviderΠανεπιστήμιο Ιωαννίνων. Σχολή Επιστημών Υγείας. Τμήμα Ιατρικήςel
heal.typejournalArticle-
heal.type.elΆρθρο Περιοδικούel
heal.type.enJournal articleen

Files

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.74 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: