Localization of accessory pathways by the electrocardiogram: which is the degree of accordance of three algorithms in use?

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Date

Authors

Katsouras, C. S.
Greakas, G. F.
Goudevenos, J. A.
Michalis, L. K.
Kolettis, T.
Economides, C.
Argyri, U.
Pappas, S.
Sideris, D. A.

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Abstract

Type of the conference item

Journal type

peer-reviewed

Educational material type

Conference Name

Journal name

Pacing Clin Electrophysiol

Book name

Book series

Book edition

Alternative title / Subtitle

Description

We evaluated the extent of agreement among three algorithms used for the localization of accessory pathways in patients with overt preexcitation. By the use of one algorithm, three independent couples of observers localized the accessory pathway in 95 consecutive patients showing overt preexcitation in the 12-lead surface electrocardiogram. We defined the following regions: Left atrioventricular ring (LAVR), Right atrioventricular ring (RAVR), Left lateral/left anterolateral (LL/LAL), Left posterior/left posterolateral (LP/LPL), Left posteroseptal (LPS), Right midseptal (RMS), Right posteroseptal (RPS), Right posterior/right posterolateral (RP/RPL), Right lateral/right anterolateral (RL/RAL), and Right anterior/right anteroseptal (RA/RAS). The extent of agreement in each region was evaluated and compared with the expected one, as calculated from the reported. The extent of agreement was as expected: (1) high in the regions LAVR, RAVR, LL/LPS and (2) limited in the regions LPS, RPS, and (3) clearly lower than expected in the regions LP/LPL, RA/RAS, RMS, RL/RAL. In cases with total or partial disagreement, the number of electrocardiograms with duration of QRS complex smaller than 120 ms was greater than in cases with total agreement (30/46 vs 22/50, P < 0.05). The observed agreement among algorithms is clearly lower than the expected one. Minimal preexcitation, limited number of patients, and arbitrarily defined regions were possibly the reasons for some unexpected results.

Description

Keywords

Algorithms, Atrioventricular Node/physiopathology, *Electrocardiography/classification/statistics & numerical data, Forecasting, Heart Conduction System/*physiopathology/surgery, Heart Septum/physiopathology, Humans, Observer Variation, Pre-Excitation Syndromes/*physiopathology/surgery, Single-Blind Method, Time Factors

Subject classification

Citation

Link

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14764169
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/store/10.1111/j.1540-8159.2004.00409.x/asset/j.1540-8159.2004.00409.x.pdf?v=1&t=h2li4f7g&s=e41d9d0b87139f6beac12b604ecafa1cb21def01

Language

en

Publishing department/division

Advisor name

Examining committee

General Description / Additional Comments

Institution and School/Department of submitter

Πανεπιστήμιο Ιωαννίνων. Σχολή Επιστημών Υγείας. Τμήμα Ιατρικής

Table of contents

Sponsor

Bibliographic citation

Name(s) of contributor(s)

Number of Pages

Course details

Endorsement

Review

Supplemented By

Referenced By