Comparison and evaluation of cloud point extraction and low-temperature directed crystallization as preconcentration tools for the determination of trace elements in environmental samples

dc.contributor.authorGiokas, D. L.en
dc.contributor.authorEksperiandova, L. P.en
dc.contributor.authorBlank, A. B.en
dc.contributor.authorKarayannis, M. I.en
dc.date.accessioned2015-11-24T16:54:08Z
dc.date.available2015-11-24T16:54:08Z
dc.identifier.issn0003-2670-
dc.identifier.urihttps://olympias.lib.uoi.gr/jspui/handle/123456789/10119
dc.rightsDefault Licence-
dc.subjectcloud point extractionen
dc.subjectdirected crystallizationen
dc.subjecttrace elementsen
dc.subjectenvironmental analysisen
dc.subjectseparation methodsen
dc.subjectatomic-absorption spectrometryen
dc.subjectmicelle-mediated methodologyen
dc.subjectsolid-phase extractionen
dc.subjectx-ray-fluorescenceen
dc.subjectsmall quantitiesen
dc.subjectwater samplesen
dc.subjectnatural-wateren
dc.subjectwaste-wateren
dc.subjectassembliesen
dc.subjectspeciationen
dc.titleComparison and evaluation of cloud point extraction and low-temperature directed crystallization as preconcentration tools for the determination of trace elements in environmental samplesen
heal.abstractA comparative study between cloud point extraction (CPE) and low-temperature directed crystallization (LTDC) is presented. Trace elements (Cd, Pb, Cr, Cu, Zn, Ni and Fe) were preconcentrated by both methods from model and natural water samples and the results were evaluated with respect to extraction efficiency, accuracy, precision, sample throughput and interferences. Flame atomic absorption spectrometry (FAAS) and inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectrometry (ICP-AES) were used for the final measurements. The results indicate that these extraction and preconcentration procedures ensure the required accuracy and precision for the reliable identification and quantification of trace elements in natural waters. Drawbacks of each method identified can further assist the analyst towards a better application of each method depending on the target species, the detector employed and the application intended (routine analysis, trace analysis, speciation analysis, etc.). (C) 2003 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.en
heal.accesscampus-
heal.fullTextAvailabilityTRUE-
heal.identifier.primaryDoi 10.1016/S0003-2670(03)00175-2-
heal.identifier.secondary<Go to ISI>://000189102800008-
heal.identifier.secondaryhttp://ac.els-cdn.com/S0003267003001752/1-s2.0-S0003267003001752-main.pdf?_tid=f1cfe0c0-349c-11e3-9497-00000aacb35f&acdnat=1381733622_20cfb99bc78438cef8e75285307bdddf-
heal.journalNameAnalytica Chimica Actaen
heal.journalTypepeer reviewed-
heal.languageen-
heal.publicationDate2004-
heal.publisherElsevier Massonen
heal.recordProviderΠανεπιστήμιο Ιωαννίνων. Σχολή Θετικών Επιστημών. Τμήμα Χημείαςel
heal.typejournalArticle-
heal.type.elΆρθρο Περιοδικούel
heal.type.enJournal articleen

Αρχεία

Φάκελος/Πακέτο αδειών

Προβολή: 1 - 1 of 1
Φόρτωση...
Μικρογραφία εικόνας
Ονομα:
license.txt
Μέγεθος:
1.74 KB
Μορφότυπο:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Περιγραφή: