Comparison of standard ruler and standard candle constraints on dark energy models

dc.contributor.authorLazkoz, R.en
dc.contributor.authorNesseris, S.en
dc.contributor.authorPerivolaropoulos, L.en
dc.date.accessioned2015-11-24T18:31:31Z
dc.date.available2015-11-24T18:31:31Z
dc.identifier.issn1475-7516-
dc.identifier.urihttps://olympias.lib.uoi.gr/jspui/handle/123456789/16479
dc.rightsDefault Licence-
dc.subjectcmbr theoryen
dc.subjectdark energy theoryen
dc.subjectsupernova type iaen
dc.subjectgamma-ray burstsen
dc.subjectcosmological implicationsen
dc.subjectsupernova dataen
dc.subjectuniverseen
dc.subjectparameteren
dc.subjectdistanceen
dc.subjectgravityen
dc.subjectmatteren
dc.titleComparison of standard ruler and standard candle constraints on dark energy modelsen
heal.abstractWe compare the dark energy model constraints obtained by using recent standard ruler data (baryon acoustic oscillations (BAO) at z = 0.2 and 0.35 and cosmic microwave background (CMB) shift parameters R and la) with the corresponding constraints obtained by using recent type Ia supernovae (SnIa) standard candle data (ESSENCE + SNLS + HST from astro-ph/0701510). We find that, even though both classes of data are consistent with Lambda CDM (CDM: cold dark matter) at the 2 sigma level, there is a systematic difference between the two classes of data. In particular, we find that for practically all values of the parameters (Omega(0m), Omega(b)) in the 2 sigma range of the three-year WMAP data (WMAP3) best fit, Lambda CDM is signi. cantly more consistent with the SnIa data than with the CMB + BAO data. For example for (Omega(0m), Omega(b)) = (0.24, 0.042) corresponding to the best fit values of WMAP3, the dark energy equation of state parameterization w(z) = w(0) + w(1)(z/1 + z) best. t is at a 0.5 sigma distance from Lambda CDM(w(0) = -1, w(1) = 0) using the SnIa data and 1.7 sigma away from Lambda CDM using the CMB + BAO data. There is a similar trend in the earlier data (SNLS versus CMB + BAO at z = 0.35). This trend is such that the standard ruler CMB + BAO data show a mild preference for crossing of the phantom divide line w = -1, while the recent SnIa data favor Lambda CDM. Despite this mild difference in trends, we find no statistically significant evidence for violation of the cosmic distance duality relation. = d(L)(z)/d(A)(z)(1 + z)(2) = 1. For example, using a prior of Omega(0m) = 0.24, we find. = 0.95 +/- 0.025 in the redshift range 0 < z < 2, which is consistent with distance duality at the 2 sigma level.en
heal.accesscampus-
heal.fullTextAvailabilityTRUE-
heal.identifier.primaryDoi 10.1088/1475-7516/2008/07/012-
heal.identifier.secondary<Go to ISI>://000258022800012-
heal.identifier.secondaryhttp://iopscience.iop.org/1475-7516/2008/07/012/pdf/1475-7516_2008_07_012.pdf-
heal.journalNameJournal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physicsen
heal.journalTypepeer reviewed-
heal.languageen-
heal.publicationDate2008-
heal.recordProviderΠανεπιστήμιο Ιωαννίνων. Σχολή Επιστημών και Τεχνολογιών. Τμήμα Βιολογικών Εφαρμογών και Τεχνολογιώνel
heal.typejournalArticle-
heal.type.elΆρθρο Περιοδικούel
heal.type.enJournal articleen

Αρχεία

Φάκελος/Πακέτο αδειών

Προβολή: 1 - 1 of 1
Φόρτωση...
Μικρογραφία εικόνας
Ονομα:
license.txt
Μέγεθος:
1.74 KB
Μορφότυπο:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Περιγραφή: