Evaluation of the end-expiratory pressure by multiple linear regression and Fourier analysis in humans

Απλή σελίδα τεκμηρίου
dc.contributor.authorMygdalou, A.en
dc.contributor.authorPsarakis, C.en
dc.contributor.authorVassiliou, P.en
dc.contributor.authorDalavanga, Y. A.en
dc.contributor.authorMandragos, C.en
dc.contributor.authorConstantopoulos, S. H.en
dc.contributor.authorBehrakis, P. K.en
dc.contributor.authorVassiliou, M. P.en
dc.date.accessioned2015-11-24T19:17:36Z
dc.date.available2015-11-24T19:17:36Z
dc.identifier.issn0954-6111-
dc.identifier.urihttps://olympias.lib.uoi.gr/jspui/handle/123456789/21796
dc.rightsDefault Licence-
dc.subjectAdulten
dc.subjectAgeden
dc.subjectAged, 80 and overen
dc.subjectAnalysis of Varianceen
dc.subjectBrain Injuries/physiopathology/therapyen
dc.subjectFemaleen
dc.subject*Fourier Analysisen
dc.subjectHumansen
dc.subjectIntensive Careen
dc.subject*Linear Modelsen
dc.subjectMaleen
dc.subjectMiddle Ageden
dc.subject*Positive-Pressure Respirationen
dc.subjectPulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive/physiopathology/therapyen
dc.subjectRespiration, Artificialen
dc.subjectRespiratory Distress Syndrome, Adult/physiopathology/therapyen
dc.subjectRespiratory Mechanicsen
dc.titleEvaluation of the end-expiratory pressure by multiple linear regression and Fourier analysis in humansen
heal.abstractThis study was designed to compare the end-expiratory pressure (EEP) during mechanical ventilation (MV) measured dynamically (EEPdyn), by multiple linear regression (MLR) of the airway pressure (Pao) vs volume (V) and flow (V') and after Fourier analysis (FA) of the Pao and V'. Pao and V' were recorded from 32 ICU patients (II without respiratory disease, 10 COPD, II ARDS) under MV, at three levels of PEEPe (0, 5 and 10 hPa). Volume was calculated by numerical integration of V'. Data were analysed by MLR and FA, while the actual value of EEPdyn was recognised on the Pao signal at zero V' and V. EEPdyn, EEPMLR and EEPFA were compared for all patients, for each group of patients and for every level of applied PEEPe. Despite the different evaluation of respiratory mechanics between MLR and FA, the EEP values were always not significantly different between the three applied methods (P > 0.05). A high degree of correlation was found between them, taken two at a time (r > 0.99, P < 0.001). Two non-invasive analytical methods for the evaluation of respiratory mechanics during MV, MLR and FA offer a reliable and clinically useful estimation of EEP during MV.en
heal.accesscampus-
heal.fullTextAvailabilityTRUE-
heal.identifier.secondaryhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12194633-
heal.identifier.secondaryhttp://ac.els-cdn.com/S0954611102913053/1-s2.0-S0954611102913053-main.pdf?_tid=60476388a53afa61e6a9ad3b61867d0f&acdnat=1333604558_d346ee5de4eb1e42c4c7b4a1271b9c47-
heal.journalNameRespir Meden
heal.journalTypepeer-reviewed-
heal.languageen-
heal.publicationDate2002-
heal.recordProviderΠανεπιστήμιο Ιωαννίνων. Σχολή Επιστημών Υγείας. Τμήμα Ιατρικήςel
heal.typejournalArticle-
heal.type.elΆρθρο Περιοδικούel
heal.type.enJournal articleen

Αρχεία

Φάκελος/Πακέτο αδειών

Προβολή: 1 - 1 of 1
Μικρογραφία εικόνας
Ονομα:
license.txt
Μέγεθος:
1.74 KB
Μορφότυπο:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Περιγραφή:
Κατεβάστε

Συλλογές

Άρθρα σε επιστημονικά περιοδικά ( Ανοικτά) - ΙΑΤ